A wave of federal threats and funding freezes has put elite universities under pressure — not for misconduct or inefficiency, but for refusing to comply with government demands. The Trump administration’s recent attacks on research at elite universities are not only wrong and politically motivated — they stall life-saving discoveries and jeopardize the United States’ leadership in science.
The most glaring escalation of these attacks is aimed at Harvard University, which recently had $2.2 billion in funding frozen. On April 11, the Department of Education gave the university a set of conditions it had to meet in order to receive funding that was already “promised and budgeted.” Despite representatives of Harvard asserting that these new demands “invade university freedoms long recognized by the Supreme Court,” the government proceeded to cut off vital money for research. What we’re seeing is not just a clash over campus policies, but a warning sign that scientific discovery, freedom and the very future of U.S. innovation are under assault.
In total, the Trump administration has recalled nearly $11 billion in research funding, scrutinizing institutions like Brown, Northwestern and the University of Pennsylvania for “wasteful spending” of research grants. Federal officials state that these grants will not be reinstated unless these institutions comply with the government’s demands, which include regulating the admission of international students, reducing diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and prohibiting transgender athletes from participating in collegiate sports.
Scientific research wasn’t always so partisan. For decades, both Democrats and Republicans have recognized that scientific discovery is vital for society. Although our current Republican administration has tried to defund the National Institutes of Health, Republicans like former House Speaker Newt Gingrich once championed doubling the budget of the National Institutes of Health. Former Republican president George Bush was the first president in history to increase research and development funding to over $100 billion. The Trump administration’s decision to base funding on ideologies and government-mandated conditions is unprecedented, signaling that even academia is no longer safe from political interference.
The consequences of Trump’s actions extend far beyond universities, threatening the lives of everyday people around the world. University-led research has historically been responsible for major advancements such as the development of CRISPR gene-editing at the University of California, Berkeley, the invention of the HPV vaccine at Georgetown University and even the foundations of the internet led by University of California, Los Angeles and Stanford University. With the amount of research that has been stalled, we could already be losing a variety of solutions, from potential cures for disease to new technologies. When a university’s research programs are defunded, the consequences are global and potentially irreversible.
But what is the end goal of all of this? Trump’s threats are less about accountability within education and more about punishing institutions that dare to stand up to political control, especially as most of the universities being targeted are known for their liberal values and global collaboration. If Americans normalize politically-motivated interference in university research, we risk losing not only our global standing in science but also the autonomy and freedom that have made our institutions so successful.
Beyond the risk of preventing new discoveries, the loss of funding directly harms student learning. When labs inevitably close due to lack of funds, undergraduate and graduate students will lose the opportunity to engage in meaningful work, give back to science and discover a potential passion for academia.
This isn’t just Harvard’s fight — it’s ours at Northeastern, too. As a global research university, many of our peers are researchers at federally funded labs, especially as we have more than 400 undergraduate and graduate students involved in research and 37 interdisciplinary research centers. Without access to well-funded research programs, students are being deprived of future career opportunities.
As Northeastern students, we must stay informed and stand in solidarity with the institutions being targeted. When research is undermined by politics, we lose more than just funding — we lose the opportunity to confront the world’s most urgent challenges with courage, creativity and evidence.
Shreya Pillamari is a third-year computer science and business administration major. She can be reached at [email protected].
If you would like to submit a letter to the editor in response to this piece, email [email protected] with your idea.
